FullEnrich vs Kris@Work
Use FullEnrich if you need verified contact details for an existing sales workflow; use Kris@Work if you want prospect research, outreach, and deal management in one platform. Both publish email and phone enrichment capabilities, but they address different amounts of the sales process. FullEnrich concentrates on finding and verifying data, while Kris@Work carries that data into prospect prioritization and sales execution.
Last updated November 1, 2026.
At a glance
| Dimension | FullEnrich | Kris@Work |
|---|---|---|
| Primary use | Contact and company data enrichment | B2B prospecting and sales execution |
| Contact data | Verified work emails, personal emails, and mobile numbers | Verified emails and phones within account research |
| Outreach | Not published | Adaptive email, LinkedIn, messaging, and call sequences |
| Deal management | Not published | AI-assisted deal execution and CRM |
| Plans and price | Free trial; credit-based Pro; custom Enterprise | Public list price not published |
| Trial | 50 credits; no credit card | Free trial; no credit card |
| Usage limits | Pro example: 1,000 credits per month; unlimited users | Not published |
| CRM integrations | HubSpot integration | Salesforce and HubSpot listed |
| Other connections | API, MCP server, and no-code integrations | Gmail, Outlook, Slack, and Zapier listed |
| Bulk workflows | CSV enrichment and export | Contact-list upload |
| Support | Priority support and dedicated manager on Enterprise | Not published |
Scroll the table sideways to compare each row.
Which should you choose?
Choose FullEnrich if
- Teams keeping their existing outreach and CRM tools
- Developers embedding contact enrichment through an API
- Teams enriching contact lists in bulk
- Buyers seeking published credit-based pricing
Choose Kris@Work if
- B2B teams wanting research and outreach in one workspace
- Reps prioritizing prospects using fit and buying signals
- Teams running adaptive, multichannel sequences
- Teams seeking AI-assisted deal management and CRM
The verdict
Pick FullEnrich when the deciding factor is adding verified emails and phone numbers to tools your team already uses, particularly through bulk enrichment or an API. Pick Kris@Work when the deciding factor is giving reps one workspace for finding prospects, researching accounts, running outreach, and managing deals. Kris@Work does not publish a list price, so a buyer comparing costs will need to request its current terms.
FullEnrich vs Kris@Work: common questions
- Are FullEnrich and Kris@Work direct substitutes?
- They overlap on finding verified prospect emails and phone numbers, but FullEnrich focuses on enrichment while Kris@Work also provides prospect research, outreach, deal tools, and CRM.
- Which should I choose if I already have a CRM and outreach tool?
- FullEnrich is the more focused choice for adding verified contact data to an existing workflow. Kris@Work is designed to bring more of the prospecting and sales workflow into one platform.
- Does Kris@Work publish its pricing?
- Kris@Work does not publish a list price on its website. Its site offers a free trial without a credit card and a way to schedule a demo.
- How does FullEnrich charge for contact data?
- FullEnrich uses credits for verified results: its published rates are one credit for a work email, three for a personal email, and ten for a mobile number. It says unsuccessful lookups do not consume credits.
- Can either product help with outreach?
- Kris@Work publishes adaptive outreach sequences across email, LinkedIn, messaging, and calls. FullEnrich publishes contact enrichment and integrations, not a native outreach sequence feature.
- Do both integrate with HubSpot?
- Yes. FullEnrich publishes a HubSpot integration for contact and company data; Kris@Work lists HubSpot among its integrations.
- Which product offers an enrichment API?
- FullEnrich publishes enrichment API access. Kris@Work publishes integrations but does not state an enrichment API offering on the product pages reviewed.
