Worklis vs Greenhouse
Choose Worklis if you want an applicant tracking system with published per-job-slot pricing; choose Greenhouse if you need structured interviewing, sourcing tools and more extensive hiring controls. Both cover applicant management, team collaboration, scheduling and reporting, but their buying models differ: Worklis lists one feature set with monthly or annual billing, while Greenhouse offers three plans with custom pricing.
Last updated October 31, 2026.
At a glance
| Dimension | Worklis | Greenhouse |
|---|---|---|
| Published price | $59 per job slot monthly or $590 per job slot annually | Custom pricing; no public amount |
| Plans | One feature set; monthly or annual billing | Core, Plus and Pro |
| Pricing basis | Per active job slot | Plan, hiring volume and organizational complexity |
| Getting started | Free trial offered; duration not published | Demo offered |
| Hiring scope | Jobs, applications and team decisions | Sourcing, interviewing and ATS solutions |
| Job advertising | Posting to multiple job boards | Job boards and job-posting tools |
| Interview evaluation | Not published | Structured interview kits and scorecards |
| Scheduling | Calendar connections and personal booking pages | Candidate self-scheduling and scheduling links |
| Integrations | Supported integrations; contact team for requirements | Prebuilt integrations and open API |
| Reporting | Recruitment analytics and hiring reports | Reports and dashboards; AI report filters in Plus and Pro |
| Access and deployment | Cloud-based browser workspace with role controls | SSO and granular user permissions |
| Support | Contact team | Customer support and learning resources |
Scroll the table sideways to compare each row.
Which should you choose?
Choose Worklis if
- Teams budgeting by active job slot
- Buyers who want published monthly and annual prices
- Teams seeking applicant tracking and scheduling without feature tiers
Choose Greenhouse if
- Teams standardizing interviews with kits and scorecards
- Organizations that need sourcing and candidate relationship management
- Hiring operations that need advanced automation or governance
The verdict
Worklis is the better fit when a clear price per active job slot and access to its available features without a higher tier are the deciding factors. Greenhouse is the better fit when structured scorecards, sourcing and progressively deeper automation and governance matter more than having a posted price. Ask each vendor about the integrations and capacity your hiring process requires before committing.
Worklis vs Greenhouse: common questions
- Is this comparison worth considering?
- Yes. Worklis and Greenhouse both offer applicant tracking for employers, and both currently invite buyers to get started or request a demo. Their pricing models and depth of hiring tools give buyers a meaningful choice.
- How much do Worklis and Greenhouse cost?
- Worklis publishes prices of $59 per active job slot per month or $590 per job slot per year. Greenhouse does not publish a fixed price; it provides custom pricing based on the plan and hiring needs.
- Does Worklis still offer Basic, Essential and Premium plans?
- Worklis currently lists one feature set with monthly or annual per-job-slot billing, not Basic, Essential and Premium feature tiers.
- Can either product schedule interviews?
- Yes. Worklis publishes calendar connections and personal booking pages. Greenhouse lists candidate self-scheduling and scheduling links in Core, Plus and Pro.
- Which product supports structured interview scorecards?
- Greenhouse lists structured interview kits and scorecards in its Core plan. Worklis does not publish a corresponding scorecard feature on the vendor pages reviewed.
- What integrations can buyers expect?
- Greenhouse publishes prebuilt integrations and an open API. Worklis lists supported integrations and invites buyers to discuss specific integration requirements with its team.
- Is there a free trial?
- Worklis offers a free-trial starting point but does not publish a trial duration on its main site. Greenhouse directs buyers to request a demo; its pricing page does not publish a free-trial offer.
- Which is better for complex hiring operations?
- Greenhouse publishes separate Plus and Pro plans for expanded automation, reporting and governance. Worklis publishes one feature set priced per job slot, which may suit teams that prefer a simpler purchasing model.