ClowdWork vs Hubstaff
Choose ClowdWork if you want work activity captured automatically without asking staff to run timers or complete timesheets; choose Hubstaff if you need project-based time tracking with payroll, scheduling, or mobile options. Both offer visibility into computer-based work, but they differ most in how time is recorded and what you can do with it afterward.
Last updated October 26, 2026.
At a glance
| Dimension | ClowdWork | Hubstaff |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking approach | Automatic background activity capture; no timer required | Project and task timers; manual time entries available |
| Published price | Not published | Starter from $4.99 per seat/month, billed annually |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux agent | Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android, browser |
| Timesheets | No timesheets required | Timesheets included |
| Screenshots | Optional; every five minutes by default | Limited on Starter and Grow; unlimited on Team |
| Integrations | NA | Over 30 available; one on Grow, unlimited on Team |
| App and URL visibility | Application and URL duration reports | Limited on Starter and Grow; unlimited on Team |
| Trial | Free trial offered; length not published | 14 days; no credit card required |
Scroll the table sideways to compare each row.
Which should you choose?
Choose ClowdWork if
- Computer-based teams that do not want to start and stop timers
- Managers comparing workload and productivity across people or areas
- Organizations that want screenshots to be optional
Choose Hubstaff if
- Teams tracking hours against projects and tasks
- Businesses that need scheduling, invoicing, or payroll features
- Field teams that need mobile time and location tracking
- Buyers who need published per-seat prices and integrations
The verdict
The deciding factor is whether you need automatic visibility into how computer-based workdays are spent or time records tied to projects and team operations. ClowdWork fits organizations measuring productivity and workload without manual reporting. Hubstaff fits teams that need timesheets, invoicing, payments, or scheduling alongside activity tracking. ClowdWork does not publish a price, so request a quote before comparing costs.
ClowdWork vs Hubstaff: common questions
- Is ClowdWork or Hubstaff better for automatic tracking?
- ClowdWork Productivity captures work activity in the background without requiring employees to start a timer. Hubstaff offers project and task timers, with manual time entries available.
- How much do ClowdWork and Hubstaff cost?
- ClowdWork does not publish a price on its website. Hubstaff's Starter plan starts at $4.99 per seat per month when billed annually and requires at least two seats.
- Do ClowdWork and Hubstaff work on mobile devices?
- Hubstaff offers iOS and Android time-tracking apps. ClowdWork publishes Windows, macOS, and Linux agents but does not list a mobile agent for its Productivity product.
- Can I turn off screenshots in ClowdWork or Hubstaff?
- ClowdWork says screenshots are optional and can be enabled or disabled. Hubstaff includes screenshot tracking on its plans; check its settings for the controls your team needs.
- Which product supports payroll and invoicing?
- Hubstaff publishes invoicing features and payments and payroll features on its Team plan. ClowdWork does not publish equivalent features for ClowdWork Productivity.
- Which product has more integrations?
- Hubstaff lists more than 30 integrations, with one included on Grow and unlimited integrations on Team. ClowdWork does not publish an integration list for its Productivity product.
- Do either ClowdWork or Hubstaff offer a free trial?
- ClowdWork offers a free trial but does not publish its length. Hubstaff offers a 14-day free trial without a credit card.
- Which is a better fit for a field team?
- Hubstaff is the clearer fit for field teams because it publishes mobile time tracking and GPS and geofencing features. ClowdWork describes its Productivity product as especially suited to computer-based work.