Apify vs ACCELQ
Use Apify to collect and automate work with web data; use ACCELQ to design, run, and manage software tests. Apify offers ready-to-run scraping tools and a platform for building your own cloud programs. ACCELQ focuses on codeless testing across web, mobile, API, and other applications. They address different jobs, so the deciding question is whether you need data from websites or evidence that your software works.
Last updated October 24, 2026.
At a glance
| Dimension | Apify | ACCELQ |
|---|---|---|
| Primary job | Web data extraction and automation | Software test automation and management |
| Work covered | Website crawling, scraping and browser tasks | Web, mobile, API and desktop testing |
| Creation approach | Prebuilt Actors or custom containerized code | Codeless test design and logic editor |
| Published price | Free; Starter $19, Scale $199, Business $999 per month, plus usage | NA |
| Free access | Free plan with $5 monthly usage | Free trial offered |
| Hosting | Actors run on Apify's cloud platform | Cloud or on-premises; 10-license on-premises minimum |
| Integrations | API, webhooks and Zapier | Jenkins, Bamboo, Jira and TFS |
| Results | Dataset exports including JSON, CSV and Excel | Test reporting and analytics |
| Parallel execution | 5 concurrent runs on Free; 32 on Starter | Unlimited in-network execution agents on Enterprise |
| Data retention | Named storage retained indefinitely | Enterprise test results retained for 1 year |
| Support | Community on Free; chat on Starter | Customer support included in annual subscription |
Scroll the table sideways to compare each row.
Which should you choose?
Choose Apify if
- Teams collecting leads or other data from websites
- Developers building custom scraping or browser-automation programs
- Buyers who want published starting prices and a continuing free plan
Choose ACCELQ if
- QA teams automating software tests without writing test code
- Teams testing web, mobile, and API applications together
- Organizations that require on-premises hosting for their testing platform
The verdict
Pick Apify if your workflow starts with extracting website data or running custom web automations; its published plans include a free tier and usage-based charges. Pick ACCELQ if your team needs codeless test creation, execution, and management across applications. ACCELQ offers cloud and on-premises hosting, but does not publish subscription prices on its pricing page, so you will need a quote to compare costs.
Apify vs ACCELQ: common questions
- Are Apify and ACCELQ alternatives for the same job?
- Usually not. Apify is a platform for extracting web data and running automations, while ACCELQ is built to create, execute, and manage software tests. Choose based on whether your goal is collecting data or validating applications.
- Which should I use to scrape websites?
- Apify is the relevant choice for website scraping. It offers ready-to-run Actors as well as a cloud platform for deploying custom scraping programs; ACCELQ's published products focus on software testing.
- Which should I use to automate regression testing?
- ACCELQ is the relevant choice for software regression testing because it publishes codeless test design, execution, and test-management capabilities. Apify instead publishes web scraping and general automation capabilities.
- How do Apify and ACCELQ prices compare?
- Apify publishes a $0 Free plan and monthly Starter, Scale, and Business prices of $19, $199, and $999, with usage charges on paid plans. ACCELQ lists product plans and a free trial but does not publish subscription prices on its pricing page; request a quote before comparing total costs.
- Do both offer a free option?
- Apify publishes an ongoing Free plan with $5 in monthly usage. ACCELQ advertises a free trial, but its pricing page does not publish an ongoing free-plan price.
- Can either product be hosted on-premises?
- ACCELQ publishes an on-premises hosting option requiring a minimum subscription of 10 licenses. Apify documents deploying Actors to run on its cloud platform; an on-premises Apify platform offering is not published on its pricing page.
- Which integrations matter most in this comparison?
- Apify documents an API, webhooks, and Zapier for moving web data into workflows. ACCELQ lists Jenkins and Bamboo for CI integration and Jira and TFS for requirements and defect integration.
- What limits should I check before choosing?
- For Apify, check monthly usage and concurrent-run allowances: its Free plan publishes $5 in monthly usage and five concurrent runs. For ACCELQ, confirm the execution capacity and license terms in your quote; its Enterprise offering publishes unlimited execution agents and parallel executions inside your network.