NachoNacho
NachoNacho

Snov.io vs Apollo.io

Choose Snov.io if you want email prospecting and verification with unlimited seats on a paid plan; choose Apollo.io if your team needs a built-in dialer and Salesforce integration. Both offer lead data, outreach sequences, pipeline management and a free plan. The deciding differences are how each charges for team access and which outreach channels you need.

Last updated October 24, 2026.

At a glance

Snov.io compared with Apollo.io, one row per dimension
DimensionSnov.ioApollo.io
Paid entry priceStarter: $39/month; $29.25/month billed annuallyBasic: $49/seat/month billed annually
Paid-plan seatsUnlimited team seatsPer-seat pricing; one plan level per account
LinkedIn outreachAutomated actions; account slots sold separatelyManual LinkedIn tasks in sequences
CallingNABuilt-in dialer on paid plans
Free-plan allowance50 credits and 100 recipients per 30 days900 credits per seat per year, granted monthly
Entry paid-plan allowanceStarter: 1,000 credits and 5,000 recipientsBasic: 30,000 credits per seat per year
Unused creditsPaid-plan rollover with eligible renewalNo rollover
CRM integrationsHubSpot and PipedriveHubSpot and Salesforce
API accessPaid plansCustom plans
Pipeline managementSales CRM with deals and tasksDeals, pipelines and tasks
PlatformsWeb app and Chrome extensionsWeb app; Chrome and Edge extension
SupportLive chat and help centerAI chat and help center; eligible paid live support

Scroll the table sideways to compare each row.

Which should you choose?

Snov.io logo

Choose Snov.io if

  • Teams that want unlimited seats on a paid plan
  • Sellers focused on email finding, verification and warm-up
  • Teams willing to add paid LinkedIn automation
  • Buyers who value rollover of eligible unused credits
See Snov.io — 30% CASHBACK
Apollo.io logo

Choose Apollo.io if

  • Teams that need calling within their sales platform
  • Salesforce users seeking a published integration
  • Reps combining email, call and LinkedIn tasks in sequences
  • Buyers who prefer a per-seat plan
See Apollo.io — 10% CASHBACK

The verdict

Snov.io is the better fit when seat costs, email deliverability tools or automated LinkedIn outreach matter most; LinkedIn automation requires a separately priced account slot. Apollo.io is the better fit when calling and Salesforce-connected workflows are central to your sales process. Compare the credit and outreach limits at the plan you would actually buy, not just the entry price.

Snov.io vs Apollo.io: common questions

Which costs less for a growing team?
Snov.io publishes a $39-per-month Starter price and unlimited seats on paid plans. Apollo.io publishes Basic at $49 per seat per month when billed annually. The total depends on seat count, required features, credits and any add-ons.
Can I use either product for free?
Yes. Snov.io's renewable free Trial includes 50 credits and 100 recipients per 30 days. Apollo.io's Free plan includes 900 credits per seat per year, granted monthly.
Does either product automate LinkedIn outreach?
Snov.io offers automated LinkedIn actions through separately priced account slots. Apollo.io includes LinkedIn engagement as manual tasks in sequences.
Which product includes a sales dialer?
Apollo.io publishes a built-in dialer for paid plans. Snov.io does not publish a comparable built-in dialer.
Do unused credits carry over?
Snov.io says unused credits can roll over on paid plans with eligible renewal; unused recipients do not. Apollo.io says unused credits do not roll over.
Which integrates with my CRM?
Snov.io publishes HubSpot and Pipedrive integrations. Apollo.io publishes HubSpot and Salesforce integrations. Check the required plan before choosing either connection.
Can I manage deals without a separate CRM?
Both products publish deal and pipeline tools. Snov.io calls its tool Sales CRM; Apollo.io offers deal management within its platform.
Can I use these products on my phone?
Apollo.io supports access through a mobile browser and retired its mobile app on August 28, 2026. Snov.io publishes a web app and Chrome extensions; a dedicated mobile app is not published.