# Buzz vs Apollo.io

Source: https://nachonacho.com/software-comparisons/buzz-vs-apollo-io
Last updated: 2026-11-01

Choose Buzz if automated LinkedIn outreach is central to your sales process; choose Apollo.io if you want a published large-scale contact database alongside prospecting and sales engagement. Both support multichannel outbound, but they handle LinkedIn differently: Buzz runs connection requests and messages in campaigns, while Apollo.io puts LinkedIn actions in sequences as tasks for a person to complete. Both currently offer sign-up and paid plans, so this is a viable comparison for outbound teams.

## At a glance

| | Buzz | Apollo.io |
| --- | --- | --- |
| LinkedIn outreach | Automated connection requests and messages | Manually completed LinkedIn sequence tasks |
| Published contact-data scale | Not published | 240M+ contacts; 30M+ accounts |
| Paid entry price | Core: $79 per seat/month, billed monthly | Basic: $49 per seat/month, billed annually |
| AI outreach | AI Employee plan; custom pricing | AI Assistant, AI Research, and workflows |
| Free plan | $0; 50 credits/month | $0; 900 credits/year, granted monthly |
| Entry paid-plan credits | Core: 500 credits/month | Basic: 30,000 credits/year, granted upfront |
| Entry paid-plan campaigns | Core: unlimited campaigns | Basic: unlimited sequences |
| CRM integrations | HubSpot, Pipedrive; Salesforce on Enterprise | Salesforce and HubSpot |
| Platforms | Web, Chrome extension, iOS, Android | Web and Chrome extension |
| Calling | Phone calling and voicemail drops on Core | US dialer on Basic; credits apply |
| White-label option | White-label platform option | Not published |
| Support | Chat and email; dedicated channel and SLA on Enterprise | Email support; dedicated support on Custom |

## Which to choose

### Choose Buzz if

- Teams that want automated LinkedIn connection requests and messages
- Outbound teams combining LinkedIn, email, and calls in campaigns
- Agencies seeking a white-label outreach platform
- Teams evaluating an AI employee for prospecting and outreach

### Choose Apollo.io if

- Teams prioritizing a published B2B contact database
- Reps who prefer to complete LinkedIn touches manually
- Buyers seeking a $49-per-seat monthly rate with annual billing
- Teams that want contact data, enrichment, and sequences together

## Verdict

Pick Buzz when the deciding factor is running LinkedIn steps automatically, particularly alongside email and calls, or when you want its white-label option. Pick Apollo.io when the deciding factor is its published contact-data scale, a lower-priced annual-billing entry plan, or LinkedIn tasks that reps complete themselves. Compare credit allowances separately from price: the vendors meter different activities and publish their allowances over different periods.

## Questions

### Is Buzz vs Apollo.io a comparison worth publishing?

Yes. Buzz and Apollo.io both currently offer sales prospecting and engagement products with free access and paid plans. A buyer choosing an outbound platform could reasonably consider both.

### Does Apollo.io automate LinkedIn connection requests like Buzz?

No. Buzz says its campaigns can run LinkedIn connection requests and messages automatically. Apollo.io adds LinkedIn steps to sequences as tasks that a person must complete on LinkedIn.

### Which costs less to start on a paid plan?

Apollo.io lists Basic at $49 per seat per month when billed annually. Buzz lists Core at $79 per seat per month when billed monthly. The billing terms differ, and both vendors also offer free access.

### How do Buzz and Apollo.io credits compare?

Buzz lists 500 credits per month on Core; Apollo.io lists 30,000 credits per year, granted upfront, on Basic. Those figures are not equivalent usage limits because the vendors charge credits for different activities.

### Which publishes a larger prospect database?

Apollo.io publishes a database size of more than 240 million contacts and 30 million accounts. Buzz offers prospect search and enrichment but does not publish a comparable overall database size.

### Can Buzz and Apollo.io connect to a CRM?

Yes. Buzz publishes HubSpot and Pipedrive integrations and lists Salesforce for Enterprise. Apollo.io publishes Salesforce and HubSpot integrations. Check the relevant plan before choosing either product.

### Does either product have a mobile app?

Buzz publishes iOS and Android mobile apps for monitoring campaigns and managing conversations. Apollo.io publishes a web product and Chrome extension; a comparable mobile app is not stated in the vendor information reviewed.

### Which is a better fit for a lead-generation agency?

Buzz is the more direct fit for an agency that needs to offer outreach software under its own brand, because it publishes a white-label option. Apollo.io is worth considering when the agency's priority is its published contact database and prospecting workflow.

## Product pages

- Buzz: https://nachonacho.com/product/buzz
- Apollo.io: https://nachonacho.com/product/Apollo

## Related comparisons

### More Buzz comparisons

- Buzz vs Dripify: https://nachonacho.com/software-comparisons/buzz-vs-dripify
- Buzz vs Outplay: https://nachonacho.com/software-comparisons/buzz-vs-outplay
- Buzz vs SalesRobot: https://nachonacho.com/software-comparisons/buzz-vs-salesrobot
- Buzz vs Snov.io: https://nachonacho.com/software-comparisons/buzz-vs-snov-io

### More Apollo.io comparisons

- Apollo.io vs BookYourData: https://nachonacho.com/software-comparisons/bookyourdata-vs-apollo-io
- Apollo.io vs Instantly.ai: https://nachonacho.com/software-comparisons/instantly-ai-vs-apollo-io
- Apollo.io vs Kaspr: https://nachonacho.com/software-comparisons/kaspr-vs-apollo-io
- Apollo.io vs Selzy: https://nachonacho.com/software-comparisons/selzy-vs-apollo-io
- Apollo.io vs Snov.io: https://nachonacho.com/software-comparisons/snov-io-vs-apollo-io