# PhantomBuster vs BrowserAct

Source: https://nachonacho.com/compare/phantombuster-vs-browseract

Choose PhantomBuster for ready-made lead sourcing, enrichment, and outreach workflows; choose BrowserAct for building reusable data-extraction Bots from descriptions of the websites and fields you need. Both offer cloud execution and ways to send results to other tools, but they differ in how you build workflows and how usage is measured.

## At a glance

| | PhantomBuster | BrowserAct |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Primary workflow | Lead sourcing, enrichment, and outreach | Reusable website data-extraction Bots |
| Workflow creation | 100+ prebuilt automations and workflows | Natural-language Agent Bots or step-based Workflows |
| Data sources | 15+ supported platforms | User-specified websites |
| Entry paid plan, monthly billing | Start: $69/month | Basic: $16/month |
| Entry paid plan, annual billing | Start: $56/month, $672 billed annually | Basic: $13/month, $156 billed annually |
| Free entry | Trial: 2 execution hours and 5 slots | Free: 200 signup credits and 2 Agent builds |
| Entry paid plan allowance | 20 execution hours/month; 500 email credits/month | 10,000 credits/month |
| Entry paid plan concurrency | 5 automation slots | 10 simultaneous tasks |
| Integrations | CRM connections; Make, n8n, Zapier, API, MCP | Make, n8n, Zapier, API, webhooks, MCP |
| Deployment | Cloud execution | Cloud Bots or local Agent CLI |
| Data export | CSV or JSON; trial capped at 10 rows | CSV or JSON |
| Support | Help center and community access | Community support on Free; email contact |

## Which to choose

### Choose PhantomBuster if

- Sales teams sourcing leads from LinkedIn and other supported platforms
- Teams using prebuilt extraction and outreach automations
- Buyers who want email enrichment and CRM connections
- Teams planning usage around execution hours and automation slots

### Choose BrowserAct if

- Teams extracting specified fields from websites they choose
- Researchers building reusable scrapers from natural-language requests
- Buyers needing cloud Bots or a locally run Agent CLI
- Teams planning usage around credits and simultaneous tasks

## Verdict

Pick PhantomBuster if your work starts with prospecting on supported platforms and ends with enriched leads or outreach. Pick BrowserAct if you need to define a repeatable extraction task for a particular website without writing browser automation code. The deciding factor is whether a prebuilt sales workflow or a custom, prompt-built scraper matches the job you will run regularly.

## Questions

### Which is better for LinkedIn prospecting?

PhantomBuster is the closer fit for LinkedIn prospecting because it publishes prebuilt LinkedIn sourcing, enrichment, and outreach workflows. BrowserAct focuses on building reusable website data-extraction Bots.

### Which should I use to scrape a website with custom fields?

BrowserAct lets you describe a website, the records to collect, and the fields to return, then build a reusable Bot. PhantomBuster offers prebuilt automations across its supported platforms.

### How do the entry paid plans compare?

With monthly billing, PhantomBuster Start is $69 per month and BrowserAct Basic is $16 per month. Start includes 20 monthly execution hours and 5 automation slots; Basic includes 10,000 monthly credits and 10 simultaneous tasks. Their allowances measure different things.

### Can I try both without paying?

PhantomBuster advertises a free trial with 2 execution hours, 5 automation slots, and a 10-row export limit. BrowserAct advertises a Free plan with 200 credits on signup, 2 free Agent builds, and 2 simultaneous tasks.

### Do I need to keep my computer running?

PhantomBuster runs automations in the cloud. BrowserAct runs Cloud Bots in managed cloud browsers and also offers a Local Agent CLI that runs on your own machine.

### Can either product send results to my other tools?

PhantomBuster publishes CRM connections plus Make, n8n, Zapier, API, and MCP options. BrowserAct publishes Make, n8n, Zapier, REST API, webhook, and MCP connections; its Google Sheets example uses Make rather than a direct integration.

### What happens when I use up my allowance?

PhantomBuster says automations pause when execution time runs out until the allowance resets or you upgrade, without automatic overage charges. BrowserAct says the current step finishes before execution pauses when credits run out; you can add credits or upgrade.

### Do the starting prices include every usage cost?

No single starting price describes every workload. PhantomBuster plans have execution-hour, slot, and feature-credit allowances. BrowserAct uses credits for Bot building and runs, Workflow steps, and optional browser or proxy services; the credits required depend on the task.

## Product pages

- PhantomBuster: https://nachonacho.com/product/phantombuster
- BrowserAct: https://nachonacho.com/product/BrowserAct