# Multiplier vs Lano

Source: https://nachonacho.com/compare/multiplier-vs-lano

Choose Multiplier if you want an employer of record that operates through its own local entities; choose Lano if you need to consolidate payroll data from existing providers. Both currently offer international hiring, payroll, and contractor management, but their employment models and payroll-consolidation offerings are the clearest differences.

## At a glance

| | Multiplier | Lano |
| --- | --- | --- |
| EOR delivery model | Own local legal entities | Network of local EOR partners |
| Payroll consolidation | Not published as a separate service | From €3 per employee per month |
| EOR starting price | $459 per employee per month, billed annually | From €499 per employee per month |
| EOR plans | Core, Growth, Enterprise | Tailored proposal based on scope |
| Multi-country payroll | From $20 per person per month, billed annually | From €19 per employee per month |
| Contractor management | From $40 per contractor per month, billed annually | From €19 per contractor per month |
| EOR country coverage | 160+ countries | 170+ countries |
| Integrations | HRIS, accounting, expense systems; API on Growth | HRIS and finance integrations; API option |
| Payroll provider flexibility | Not published | Consolidates data from any local payroll provider |
| Support | Named customer success manager; 24/5 EOR support | Dedicated onboarding; customer success team |
| Minimum headcount | No minimum; single hire supported | Not published |

## Which to choose

### Choose Multiplier if

- Buyers who prefer an EOR operating through its own local entities
- Teams comparing published annual and monthly EOR rates
- Companies hiring their first international employee

### Choose Lano if

- Companies retaining local payroll providers but seeking consolidated reporting
- Mid-market teams with established HRIS or finance systems
- Buyers seeking a separately priced payroll-consolidation service

## Verdict

Multiplier is the better fit when direct-entity EOR delivery and published annual and monthly EOR rates are deciding factors. Lano is the better fit when you want to keep local payroll providers while bringing their data into one platform. Check the countries and services you need before choosing: published coverage figures describe each vendor’s broader offering, not necessarily every service in every country.

## Questions

### Can Multiplier and Lano hire employees where I have no entity?

Yes. Both offer employer-of-record services for hiring employees without setting up a local legal entity. Multiplier says it uses its own local entities; Lano says it uses EOR partners.

### How much does employer of record cost with Multiplier vs Lano?

Multiplier lists Core EOR at $459 per employee per month billed annually, or $499 billed monthly. Lano lists EOR from €499 per employee per month and says its final price is tailored to the countries, team size, and services required.

### Which is better if I already have local payroll providers?

Lano is the clearer fit for retaining existing providers: it separately offers payroll consolidation from €3 per employee per month and says it can work with any local payroll provider. Multiplier does not publish a separately priced, provider-agnostic consolidation service.

### Do both platforms manage contractors?

Yes. Multiplier lists contractor management from $40 per contractor per month billed annually; Lano lists it from €19 per contractor per month. Multiplier also lists a separate Contractor of Record service.

### Do Multiplier and Lano integrate with HR systems?

Yes. Both publish HRIS integrations. Multiplier lists HRIS integrations and API access with its Growth EOR plan; Lano publishes HRIS and finance integrations and an API integration option.

### Which vendor supports more EOR countries?

Lano publishes EOR hiring through partners in 170+ countries, while Multiplier states that its platform supports hiring in 160+ countries. Confirm availability for each intended country and service with the vendor.

### Can I start with one employee?

Multiplier explicitly says it has no minimum headcount and supports a single hire. Lano says smaller companies can use its platform but does not publish a minimum headcount.

## Product pages

- Multiplier: https://nachonacho.com/product/multiplier
- Lano: https://nachonacho.com/product/lano