# Eqvista vs Qapita

Source: https://nachonacho.com/compare/eqvista-vs-qapita

Choose Eqvista if you want a low-cost cap table with published monthly per-stakeholder pricing and an annual 409A bundle; choose Qapita if you need a free tier for up to 25 stakeholders or a path to global stock-plan administration. Both vendors currently offer cap table and equity-plan management, but their free-plan limits, paid pricing, integrations, and service packages differ.

## At a glance

| | Eqvista | Qapita |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Free-plan eligibility | Free; fewer than 20 stakeholders on pricing page | Free Spark; up to 25 stakeholders and under $1M raised |
| Paid cap table pricing | Premium: $2 per stakeholder/month; custom above 50 | Surge: $1,600/year for up to 40 stakeholders |
| Additional stakeholders | Custom pricing above 50 stakeholders | Surge: $40 each/year; Growth: $60 each/year |
| 409A valuations | Bundle from $990/year; unlimited updates and renewals | Included in $3,000/year Growth; add-on on lower tiers |
| ASC 718 reporting | Additional service from $500 | Included in Enterprise; add-on on Surge and Growth |
| Integrations | Not published | SSO and HRIS options; plan or setup fees apply |
| Document signing | Certificates and SAFE agreements on Premium | DocuSign for grants and certificates on published plans |
| Financial modeling | Waterfall and funding-round modeling on Premium | Funding-round modeling on Spark; waterfall on Enterprise |
| Migration assistance | Cap table onboarding on Premium | Onboarding and migration support on Surge |
| Support | Email support; client support with 409A bundle | Email on Surge; admin phone support on Enterprise |
| Deployment | Cloud-based platform | Cloud-based platform |
| Full-service administration | Not published | Included in Enterprise; add-on on Surge and Growth |

## Which to choose

### Choose Eqvista if

- Teams seeking published monthly per-stakeholder cap table pricing
- Companies seeking an annual 409A and Premium cap table bundle
- Buyers who need waterfall and funding-round modeling on Premium

### Choose Qapita if

- Startups eligible for a free plan with up to 25 stakeholders
- Teams seeking HRIS or SSO integration options
- Companies considering full-service equity-plan administration
- Businesses managing stock plans across borders

## Verdict

Eqvista is the better fit when the deciding factor is straightforward cap table pricing or an annual 409A package with unlimited updates during the subscription year. Qapita is the better fit when you need its larger free tier, HRIS or SSO options, or full-service equity-plan administration. Compare the plan you would actually use: advanced features and support are not included at every tier.

## Questions

### Is an Eqvista vs Qapita comparison worth publishing?

Yes. Eqvista and Qapita both currently offer purchasable cap table and equity-management products, with enough published plan information to compare them.

### Which has the larger free plan, Eqvista or Qapita?

Qapita publishes a free Spark plan for up to 25 stakeholders, provided the company has raised less than $1 million. Eqvista’s current pricing page describes its free tier as covering fewer than 20 stakeholders.

### How much do Eqvista and Qapita cost after the free tier?

Eqvista lists Premium at $2 per stakeholder per month, with custom pricing above 50 stakeholders. Qapita lists Surge at $1,600 per year for up to 40 stakeholders, plus $40 per additional stakeholder per year.

### Do Eqvista and Qapita offer 409A valuations?

Both do. Eqvista lists a 409A and Premium cap table bundle starting at $990 per year, with unlimited updates and renewals during the subscription year. Qapita includes a 409A report in its listed $3,000-per-year Growth plan and offers it as an add-on on lower tiers.

### Which offers integrations with HRIS or SSO systems?

Qapita publishes HRIS and SSO integration options, with availability and setup fees depending on the plan. Eqvista does not publish comparable integration details in its current pricing information.

### Which includes ASC 718 reporting?

Eqvista lists ASC 718 as an additional service starting at $500. Qapita lists financial reporting under ASC 718 on Enterprise and offers expense-reporting options as add-ons on lower paid plans.

### Can either vendor help migrate an existing cap table?

Yes. Eqvista lists cap table onboarding with Premium. Qapita lists onboarding and migration support with Surge.

### Which is a better fit for outsourced equity-plan administration?

Qapita is the clearer fit for outsourced administration: it publishes full-service equity-plan administration on Enterprise and as an add-on on Surge and Growth. Eqvista does not publish a comparable full-service administration package.

## Product pages

- Eqvista: https://nachonacho.com/product/deal-eqvista
- Qapita: https://nachonacho.com/product/qapita