# Browse AI vs BrowserAct

Source: https://nachonacho.com/compare/browse-ai-vs-browseract

Choose Browse AI if you want to review extracted data in tables and set up recurring website monitoring; choose BrowserAct if you want to describe a task in plain language and turn it into a reusable Bot, with a local CLI option. Both offer no-code web extraction, scheduled cloud runs, and CSV and JSON output. Their credit allowances are measured differently, so compare the cost of your actual tasks rather than the credit totals alone.

## At a glance

| | Browse AI | BrowserAct |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Workflow creation | AI-suggested tables or visual robot training | Prompt-built Agent Bots or step-based Workflow Bots |
| Platforms and runtime | Cloud robots; browser-extension recorder | Cloud Bots; local Agent CLI |
| Annual-plan starting price | Personal: $19/month, billed annually | Basic: $13/month, billed annually |
| Monthly-plan starting price | Personal: $48/month | Basic: $16/month |
| Free allowance | 50 credits monthly; 2 domains | 200 signup credits; 2 free Agent Builds |
| Credit metering | Standard sites: 1 credit per 10 rows; task minimum applies | Agent build and runs or 3 credits per Workflow step |
| Website limits | 2 free; 5 Personal; 10 Professional domains | Not published |
| Simultaneous-task limits | Not published | 2 free; 10 Basic; 20 Essential; 40 Advanced |
| Monitoring | Hourly minimum free; five-minute minimum paid | Scheduled Bots and change alerts; interval not published |
| Integrations | Google Sheets, Airtable, Make, Zapier, API, webhooks | Make, n8n, Zapier, API, webhooks, MCP |
| Data export | CSV, JSON, Amazon S3 | CSV, JSON |
| Support | Email; priority email on Professional | Community on Free; paid-tier level not published |

## Which to choose

### Choose Browse AI if

- Teams that want to review and refine AI-suggested extraction columns
- Users who prefer visual, point-and-click robot training
- Teams that need a published five-minute monitoring interval on paid plans
- Buyers who need published domain and user allowances

### Choose BrowserAct if

- Users who want to create reusable Agent Bots from plain-language instructions
- Teams that want a choice between Agent Bots and step-based Workflow Bots
- Developers who want a local CLI as well as cloud execution
- Buyers who need published simultaneous-task allowances

## Verdict

The deciding factor is how you want to build and run the workflow. Browse AI fits teams that want AI-suggested data tables, visual robot training, and published monitoring intervals. BrowserAct fits teams that want prompt-built Agent Bots, step-based Workflow Bots, or execution through a local CLI. Neither is the better choice for every workload; test a representative site and its credit use before committing.

## Questions

### Which is easier to set up without code?

Browse AI can propose a data table from a URL or let you train a robot visually. BrowserAct lets you describe a task in plain language to build a reusable Agent Bot and also offers step-based Workflow Bots. The better fit depends on whether you prefer reviewing columns, demonstrating actions, or writing instructions.

### Do Browse AI and BrowserAct have free plans?

Browse AI publishes a free plan with 50 credits per month and access to two domains. BrowserAct publishes a free offer with 200 credits on signup and two free Agent Builds. Those credits are not directly comparable because the products meter tasks differently.

### What do the cheapest paid plans cost?

Browse AI Personal starts at $19 per month billed annually, or $48 with monthly billing. BrowserAct Basic starts at $13 per month billed annually, or $16 with monthly billing. Compare the included usage as well as the subscription price.

### How do the credits differ?

Browse AI publishes a standard-site rate of one credit per 10 extracted rows, subject to a per-task minimum and higher rates for premium sites. BrowserAct credits cover Agent Bot building and runs, Workflow Bot steps, and optional services; it publishes a rate of three credits per executed Workflow step.

### Can both products monitor websites automatically?

Yes. Browse AI offers scheduled monitoring and change notifications, with an hourly minimum interval on Free and a five-minute minimum on paid plans. BrowserAct publishes scheduled cloud Bots and change alerts but does not publish a minimum interval.

### Can I run either product on my own machine?

BrowserAct publishes a local Agent CLI with no BrowserAct runtime charge for local execution; optional BrowserAct services can use credits. Browse AI publishes cloud-run robots and a browser extension for recording tasks, rather than a local robot runtime.

### Which integrations and exports do they offer?

Browse AI publishes Google Sheets, Airtable, Make, Zapier, REST API, webhooks, and CSV, JSON, and Amazon S3 exports. BrowserAct publishes Make, n8n, Zapier, REST API, webhooks, MCP, and CSV and JSON exports.

### What limits should I check before choosing?

Browse AI publishes domain allowances of two on Free, five on Personal, and 10 on Professional, but does not publish a simultaneous-task limit in its pricing table. BrowserAct publishes simultaneous-task allowances of two on Free, 10 on Basic, 20 on Essential, and 40 on Advanced, but does not publish a website limit.

## Product pages

- Browse AI: https://nachonacho.com/product/browse-ai
- BrowserAct: https://nachonacho.com/product/BrowserAct